Center for Science in the Public Interest v. Regan
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge MacKINNON.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge J. SKELLY WRIGHT.
MacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge:
This case involves a rule and two subsequent rescissory rules. The district court held the first rescissory rule to be invalid because the agency did not provide an adequate explanation for the rescission of the initial rule. After the present appeals were taken from the decision of the district court, the agency undertook further rule-making and promulgated a second, qualified rescission. We conclude that the second *64rescission eviscerates…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- David A. Clarke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- National Black Police Association v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- American Library Association, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Northwest Pipeline Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, No. 87-1502Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.