Legal Opinion
Nathan Lee Hogan v. Dan McBride and Pamela Carter
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 16, 1996No. 95-1498PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Nathan Hogan is serving time in Indiana for armed robbery, criminal confinement, and possession of an unlicensed handgun. His petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 contends that his convictions are invalid for three reasons: delay in holding the trial violated the speedy trial clause; he did not receive competent legal assistance; and he was denied the right to cross-examine a witness, in violation of the confrontation clause. The district court decided against Hogan on the first two claims. The delay between charge and trial, approximately eight months, is not…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Pruitt v. MoteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Byron Blake v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Floyd Richardson v. Michael LemkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Anthony Porter v. Richard B. Gramley, Warden, Pontiac Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Johnny R. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.