Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Lee

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 15, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtSchuchman, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $1,150, claimed to have been delivered to the defendant by the infant plaintiff for investment in stocks to the credit of the plaintiff. Subsequently the plaintiff demanded said sum from the defendant.

There is no allegation in the complaint, nor any proof upon the trial, that the defendant did not so invest said money and deliver the stocks purchased to the plaintiff. The plaintiff should have alleged in his complaint and proved on the trial that the defendant had failed to invest the moneys as directed; or, having so invested it, that he received…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rice v. . ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. JacobsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  3. Mordecai v. PearlNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mutual Milk & Cream Co. v. PriggeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Sparandera v. Staten Island Garage, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1921
  3. Stoffberg v. Hosbach Motors, Inc.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API