Legal Opinion

Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. Jacobs

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 6, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the third' district court. Replevin by the Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Company against Esther Jacobs. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

This is a replevin action brought to recover the possession of one of plaintiff’s sewing machines, which defendant obtained on a contract or conditional bill of sale, in the usual form, by the terms of which the title to the machine remained in the plaintiff until it was paid for in full; and in event of the defendant not paying the installments agreed upon, and the plaintiff was compelled to take back the property, the. installments actually paid were to be regarded as money paid for the use of the machine. The defense interposed was infancy, and a counterclaim for the amount paid on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Badger v. PhinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  2. Green v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. People v. KendallNew York Supreme Court · 1841
  4. Eckstein v. FrankNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1863
  5. Bartholomew v. FinnemoreNew York Supreme Court · 1854

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rice Auto Co. v. SpillmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
  2. Rice v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Sparandera v. Staten Island Garage, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1921
  4. Pierce v. LeeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1901
  5. Benedict v. FlanneryAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API