Legal Opinion

Mordecai v. Pearl

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Robert L. Mordecai, an infant, by Allen L. Mordecai, his guardian ad litem, against Dyer Pearl, Eugene L. Mordecai, and George C. Thomas to recover money advanced as margins on stock purchased and sold. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Per curiam

It is conceded by the appellants that the plaintiff, an infant, had a right to recover the money deposited by him with the appellants on- his returning to the appellants all that he had received under the contract. It does not appear, however, that the infant has received anything under this contract, except the notices of the purchases and sales of the stock made by the defendants for his account. He certainly never received any of the stock alleged to have been purchased for him, nor the proceeds of the sales of any of the stock alleged to have been sold for his account; and, as the notices…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Green v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joseph v. SchatzkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Falk v. MacMastersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Kane v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Pierce v. LeeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1901
  5. Schroeder v. HittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API