Legal Opinion
People v. Perez
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*76OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert G. Seewald, J.
Motion by the People to compel the defendant to furnish them with a copy of two tape-recorded interviews which defense counsel and his investigator separately conducted of a prosecution witness is granted to the extent of directing defense counsel to either make said disclosure prior to the commencement of trial (see, State v Strandy, 49 Wash App 537, 745 P2d 43, review denied 109 Wash 2d 1027) or, upon his failure to do so, precluding his complete use of said tapes for any purpose upon the trial of the instant indictment (see, State v Young, 94 Ore…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- People v. SmallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. ColavitoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. CulkinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DurhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Commonwealth v. DurhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006