Legal Opinion

CIM Ins. Corp. v. Masamitsu

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided December 6, 1999No. Civ. 97-01533SPK, Civ. 98-00114SPKPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SAMUEL P. KING, Senior District Judge.

These consolidated cases raise several insurance coverage and bad faith issues arising from an underlying dispute between Tony Masamitsu; Tony Management Group; Pacific Nissan, Inc.; and Pacific MH, Inc., (“the Tony Group”), on the one hand, and Franklin Kudo, Ross Sugi-bayashi, Sophie Isobe, and Eve Okumura (“the Kudo Group”), on the other. The CIM Insurance Corporation 1 insured the Tony Management Group, Inc., with a commercial package policy consisting of property loss, commercial…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. White v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. The Burlington Insurance Company v. Oceanic Design & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Illinois National Insurance v. Nordic PCL Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  4. Burlington Insurance v. United Coatings Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2007
  5. Group Builders, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API