North River Ins. Co. v. Reeder
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, O. J.
(after stating the facts as above). The stipulations in the policy and notes referred to in the statement above were valid ones. Thomas v Insurance Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 277 S. W. 1041; Insurance Co. v. Baggett (Tex. Civ. App.) 275 S. W. 313; Duncan v. Insurance Co., 113 Tex. 305, 254 S. W. 1101. As they were, and as it appeared that the note due June 12,1924, had not been paid November 8, 1924, when the fire occurred, the judgment should have been in favor of plaintiff in error, unless it appeared from the testimony heard at the trial that it was guilty of conduct which deprived…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Duncan v. United Mutual Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Equitable Life Assurance Society v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Thomas v. North River Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. L. B. Stone Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- Home Ins. Co. v. PuckettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Turner v. Supreme Lodge Knights of PythiasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Crawford Undertaking Co. v. Herman Siegel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Harris v. Glen Falls GroupCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Lee v. &198tna Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929