Legal Opinion

Crawford Undertaking Co. v. Herman Siegel, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1950No. 2898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIREY, Justice.

Herman Siegel, Inc., a California corporation, recovered judgment in the. sum of $661.00 with interest and costs (nonjury) against Crawford Undertaking Company, a Texas corporation, domiciled in Dallas, Texas. Defendant duly excepted and perfected its appeal. There was no request for findings of fact and conclusions of law and none were filed.

The judgment is assailed on five points. They are in effect: (1, 2 and 3) that it has no support in the pleadings, nor is it supported by competent evidence; (4) the court erred in admitting declarations made by Sholars not in the course…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oats v. Dublin National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Dunlap v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Capitol Hotel Co. v. RittenberryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. West Texas Produce Co. v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Worth Finance Co. v. Charlie Hillard Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McGehee v. Exchange Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Mossler Acceptance Co. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1952
  3. Radcliff Finance Corp. v. Industrial State Bank of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. United States v. HextDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API