Hansen v. Allen Memorial Hospital
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARK W. BENNETT, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
This discovery dispute raises the question of whether a federal court in a claim arising under federal law with pendent state law claims must respect and apply a limited confidential privilege created solely under state law. This issue arises in the context of an employment discrimination claim pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. filed by Plaintiff Donna Hansen against Defendant Allen Memorial Hospital.
Allen Memorial Hospital is seeking non-party discovery of tape-recorded…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Bieter CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Holland v. Muscatine General HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1997
- Franzon v. Massena Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Smith v. Alice Peck Day Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
- Davidson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.