Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Allen Memorial Hospital

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided January 31, 1992No. 4-91-MC-1-23-472PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARK W. BENNETT, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION.

This discovery dispute raises the question of whether a federal court in a claim arising under federal law with pendent state law claims must respect and apply a limited confidential privilege created solely under state law. This issue arises in the context of an employment discrimination claim pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. filed by Plaintiff Donna Hansen against Defendant Allen Memorial Hospital.

Allen Memorial Hospital is seeking non-party discovery of tape-recorded…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Bieter CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. Holland v. Muscatine General HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1997
  3. Franzon v. Massena Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
  4. Smith v. Alice Peck Day Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
  5. Davidson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API