Legal Opinion
Holland v. Muscatine General Hospital
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided June 3, 1997No. 3:96-cv-10075PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL
WALTERS, United States Magistrate Judge.
The above resisted motion to compel is before the Court following hearing. It concerns the production of documents and information from physician peer review records. Subsequent to the hearing and at the Court’s request, counsel for the defendant hospital forwarded the peer review records of Drs. Weis and Atwell for in camera review, as well as records concerning Dr. Weis previously produced by the hospital, and records concerning Dr. Atwell which the hospital proposes to produce subject to the approval of Dr.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Memorial Hospital for McHenry County v. The Honorable Milton I. Shadur, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- Sonnino v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Virmani v. Novant Health Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- John B. v. GoetzDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Syposs v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.