Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided December 10, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00063Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION PAUL DAVIDSON PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 3:20-cv-00063 KGB UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER Pending before the Court is a motion to compel filed by defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”) (Dkt. No. 15). Plaintiff Paul Davidson responded in opposition to the motion (Dkt. No. 17). Union Pacific filed a supplement to its motion to compel, and Mr. Davidson filed a supplement in opposition (Dkt. Nos. 18, 19). For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion to compel (Dkt. No. 15).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deborah L. Schoffstall v. William Henderson, Agent U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. Harlan v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. Heilman v. WaldronDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  4. Hansen v. Allen Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API