Legal Opinion
In re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 15, 2004No. Nos. MDL 1409, M 21-95PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAULEY, District Judge.
This consolidated class action, alleging violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., and the South Dakota Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”), arises out of an alleged price-fixing conspiracy by and among Visa and MasterCard and their member banks (collectively “Defendants”) with respect to currency conversion fees. Presently before this Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to certify three distinct classes in their pending actions. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Labauve v. Olin Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2005
- Ross v. American Express Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Schrank v. CitibankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Dial Corp. v. News Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.