Legal Opinion
Stanfield v. Arnwine
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 1921PublishedCited by 11 opinions
From MalHeur: Dalton Biggs, Judge. In Banc.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, C. J.
It is averred by both parties to this action that the defendant executed an instrument in writing of which the portions material to this controversy are here set down:
“Know all men by these presents that I, R. Arnwine of Juntura, County of TIarney, State of Or., hereby covenant and agree to sell, convey and deliver to R. N. Stanfield, of Stanfield, Oregon, on or before the - day -, 19 — , about 3800 head of mixed lambs now being located range and being all of our — my — 1918 crop, for the sum of nine & no -Dollars per head, payment to be made in the following manner: $5000 00/100 upon the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Crosby v. De BordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Kenan, McKay & Spier v. Home Fertilizer & Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Morrell v. San Tomas Etc. Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Maeder Steel Products Co. v. ZanelloOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Mathieson Alkali Works v. Virginia Banner Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- First National Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Nixon v. Cascade Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.