Legal Opinion
Clement v. Pehar
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided August 8, 1983No. Civ. A. C82-1677APublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHOOB, District Judge.
Plaintiffs initiated this action on August 10, 1982, alleging that in a 1980 transaction involving the sale to them of interests in a Nevada gold and silver mining venture, defendants violated the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77a, et seq., the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) provisions of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961, et seq., various state securities laws, and common law provisions against fraud.
In August 1980 each plaintiff purchased various percentages of working…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Time, Inc. v. Frank ManningCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Stafford v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Republic of Panama v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. VigmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Rolls-Royce Motors, Inc. v. Charles Schmitt & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Soltex Polymer Corp. v. Fortex Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Brown Ex Rel. Rhiner v. KerkhoffDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.