Legal Opinion
Frulla v. CRA Holdings, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 30, 2008No. 06-14626PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
In this case we must decide whether a consent decree (“the Agreed Judgment”) obligating the Appellee CRA Holdings, Inc. (“CRA”) to provide to the retirees of a predecessor corporation lifetime health care coverage under an insurance plan precludes the imposition of a contribution requirement. The district court denied Appellant Frulla’s request for a declaratory judgment that the contribution requirement violates the Agreed Judgment. We REVERSE.
I. BACKGROUND
A. The Original Action
Robert Frulla, a retired employee of the original corporation, Transway International…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ameritas Variable Life Insurance v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Edwards v. Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Hollywood Mobile Estates Ltd. v. Seminole TribeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Carol Tims v. LGE Community Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Federal Trade Commission v. LeshinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Thomas v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.