Legal Opinion
Michael Zemonick v. Consolidation Coal Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 22, 1985No. 84-1353PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNSWORTH, Senior Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs, eleven former employees of Consolidation Coal Company, were discharged for allegedly instigating a wildcat strike. Each plaintiff took his discharge to arbitration, where the dismissals were upheld. In July 1981, approximately sixteen months after the discharges and thirteen months after the last of the arbitration decisions upholding the discharges, the plaintiffs commenced this action in a state court against the employer and the union. They asserted Vaca-Hines1 hybrid claims, charging the employer with a breach of the collective bargaining…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Linda Mulligan v. Francis HazardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Stephen Juzwin and Mary Juzwin, His Wife v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., Individually and as Successor to Johnson's Company Carey Canadian Mines Amtorg Trading Corporation and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Flintkote Mines, Ltd. Turner & Newall, P.L.C. John Doe Corporation (A Fictitious Name Representing One or More Corporations or Companies, Engaged in the Business of Mining, Manufacturing, Distributing or Supplying Finished and Unfinished Asbestos Products and Fibers to Plaintiffs' Employer Gaf/ruberoid) Judy Doe Corporations (A Fictitious Name Representing One or More Legal Entities Who Stand in the Shoes of the John Doe Either as Successor in Interest, Alter Ego, or by Other Equitable Doctrine Which Makes Them Responsible for the John Doe Liability). Amtorg Trading Corp., Third-Party v. Leonard J. Buck, Inc., Flintkote Mines, Ltd., National Gypsum Company and Turner & Newall, P.L.C., Third-Party and Carey Canada, Inc., and Third-Party v. Lac D'AmiAnte Du Quebec Limitee, Individually and as Successor to Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. And Bell Asbestos Mines Limited, and Leonard J. Buck, Inc., Third-Party and Fourth-Party v. Associated Ore & Metal Corp., Ltd., Fourth-Party Appeal of Carey Canada, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Michael Zemonick v. Consolidation Coal Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Chris N. v. Burnsville, Minn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.