Legal Opinion
Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 10, 1990No. 89-5420PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*688OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
Carey Canada, Inc., (defendant) appeals from an interlocutory order of the district court denying its motion for summary judgment based on the New Jersey statute of limitations. The district court concluded that NJ.Stat.Ann. § 2A:14-22 (West 1987) (the “tolling statute”) is constitutional. Therefore, defendant’s failure to designate a representative to accept service of process pursuant to that statute tolled the statute of limitations. The district court certified the order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (1982). Since that order involves a controlling…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Simon v. CebrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Pic-A-State Pa, Inc. v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Charles Powers, Marguerite Powers v. The Southland Corporation T/a 7-Eleven Robert YeagerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- General Motors Corp. v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Buzzard v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.