Legal Opinion

Brawner v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 2000No. 98-CM-753PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, Associate Judge:

In this case, appellant Daniel W. Brawn-er, raises constitutional arguments against the deferred sentencing agreement which he executed with the United States Attorneys office. The agreement deferred sentencing in connection with his plea of guilty to a charge of assault of Revondra Payne, 1 in violation of D.C.Code § 22-504 (1996). It also granted to the United States the exclusive right to determine whether Brawner violated any condition of the agreement and, in case of violation, to seek sentencing immediately. After the United States terminated the agreement, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Thomas R. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Ventura v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Yemson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API