Legal Opinion
Harris v. Clayton
California Supreme Court
Decided July 7, 1921No. S. F. No. 8926PublishedCited by 2 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Arnold C. Lackenbach and Lionel D. Hargis for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloans, J.
The plaintiff brought this action as the assignee of one W. J. Conroy to recover a balance on account for goods sold and delivered from San Francisco to the defendant .in Manila, Philippine Islands.
The account covered a period of several years and the total sales amounted to many thousands of dollars upon which payments were made from time to time.
It is claimed by plaintiff that the account was carried for the entire period as an open running mutual account. The items sued for constitute an alleged balance for goods sold and delivered between the first day of November, 1913, and the first day…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Giselman v. StarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Walker v. McCuskerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. CerfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Tandy v. WaeschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Los Robles Water Co. v. StonemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- McIntyre v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- New York Cloak & Suit House v. CostonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928