Legal Opinion
Harris Structural Steel Co. v. Dean
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided November 30, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
This is an action by the former employer of one now deceased to recover from the widow, who is also the administratrix, the sum of $1,300 which the employer was required to pay to the State Treasurer [Fund for Reopened Cases], when, as the result of circumstances to be stated, and within the definitions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, it developed that “ there are no persons entitled to compensation ” (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subds. 7, 8; § 25-a). The plaintiff relies upon an undertaking by the widow, in effect to reimburse it, if it should be required to make these payments by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Arizona Employers' Liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Surace v. DannaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1956
- In re the Accounting of GrassoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
- In re the Estate of CampanelliNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958