Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
This case was submitted to the state court upon an agreed statement of facts, and presented the question of the validity of a provision of section twenty-nine of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of New York under the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Joseph Perroth, in the course of his employment by one Anderson, was killed through the negligence of the appellant, The Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Company. Perroth left surviving him a dependent, his widow. The administratrix of Perroth brought an action against the appellant to recover damages caused by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. YeldellSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- R. E. Sheehan Co. v. ShulerSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- New York State Railways v. ShulerSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
3Cited by49 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. George Colon & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Graham & Norton Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- In re the Estate of KilloughNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- Hunter v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.