Wilson v. Hotchkiss
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The first trial of this cause resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant’s appeal was considered by the district court of appeal of the third district, where every legal consideration pressed upon the attention of that court is clearly, fully, and satisfactorily disposed of. (Wilson v. Hotchkiss, 21 Cal. App. 392, [132 Pac. 88].) That court very properly ordered a reversal of the judgment and a new trial for the failure of the trial court to give any instructions touching the statute of frauds and its applicability to the contract under consideration. Upon the new…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shindler v. . HoustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Garfield v. ParisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Snider v. ThrallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Wilson v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Malone v. PlatoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Deitrick v. SinnottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Mahoney v. KennedyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Olcese v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Skellenger v. EnglandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Sloan v. HiattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.