Wilson v. Hotchkiss
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff’s assignor, F. B. Wilson, was, on and prior to October 1, 1907, the owner of one thousand shares of the capital stock of the Star Lumber Company, a corporation,- that prior to said date said F. B. Wilson had indorsed said shares in blank and as so indorsed had delivered the same to defendant by way of pledge thereof as security for the payment of the indebtedness of said F. B. Wilson to defendant who continued to hold said pledge until said date, “on which day, and while said defendant still had in his possession said certificate, in the manner and for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Dutcher v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Shindler v. . HoustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Garfield v. ParisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- A. C. Dauphiny & Co. v. Red Poll Creamery Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. SheedyOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Wilson v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Sloan v. HiattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Gard v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913