Legal Opinion

Cerankowski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 2001PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLally-Green, J.

¶ 1 Appellant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, appeals the order entered August 9, 2000, which granted the petition of Appellee, Sharon Ceran-kowski, to vacate award of arbitrators. We affirm.

¶2 The trial court found the following facts:

On September 11, 1991, Sharon Cer-ankowski, sustained serious injuries in an automobile accident. She was nineteen years old at the time. The individual operating the other vehicle in the accident was insured by Keystone Insurance Company. In November of 1994 Keystone offered $250,000, its policy limit, in order to settle Ms. Ceranskowski’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daley-Sand v. West American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Allstate Insurance v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Azpell v. Old Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Caron v. Reliance InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. In Re the Arbitration Between Shoemaker & the City of ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. U.S. Claims, Inc. v. DoughertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Hartford Insurance v. O'MaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Joseph v. Advest, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Conner v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Professional Flooring Co. v. Bushar Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API