Christopher v. City of El Paso
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellants have filed a very able motion ■attacking practically all of our holdings in the original opinion.
We shall not attempt to discuss any of their assignments except those relating to the question of whether Johnson, at the time of the accident, was acting as the agent of the city and as to the correctness •of the trial court’s action in rendering judgment non obstante veredicto.
Appellants contended on the former hearing that the facts in evidence were sufficient to show that Johnson was acting as the agent of the city, as a matter of law. We disagreed with such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Skov v. CoffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Starkey v. H. O. Wooten Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Amarillo Transfer & Storage Co. v. De ShongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Duvall v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Gurley v. Pilgrim Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.