Legal Opinion

Gurley v. Pilgrim Oil Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1926No. 629-4489PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.

This ease is stated fully by the Court of Civil Appeals. See 275 S. W. 295. It is unnecessary to repeat that statement here. The only question we are to determine is whether- or not there is any evidence sustaining the judgments of both lower courts on a question of fact. Both courts held that the contract in question was signed as prepared by-Brown, attorney for Carruth. If there is any evidence sustaining this finding, the judgments must be affirmed. That finding controls the case. There is no controversy about the law applicable to such a finding.

The nature of the controverted fact issue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CrumpTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Davie v. TerrillTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Gurley v. Pilgrim Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. Whaley Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Pan-American Life Ins. Co. v. American Industrial Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Sonora Realty Co. v. Fabens Townsite & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Christopher v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API