Legal Opinion
Sage Investors v. Group W Cable, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided November 19, 1986No. Civ. 86-1061 PHX RCBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BROOMFIELD, District Judge.
This case involves two cable equipment leasing contracts. One lease involves cable television equipment in Manhattan, New York while the other involves cable equipment in Los Angeles, California. Plaintiff, Sage Investors (Sage), succeeded to the interest of the lessor (Paoli Leasing Company) and defendant, Group W (GW), succeeded to the interest of the lessees (Theta Cable System and Teleprompter-Manhattan Cable System) under the lease. Upon expiration of the leases on June 30, 1985, GW refused to return the equipment to Sage. GW alleged it properly exercised…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nelson & Small, Inc. v. Polaris Industries Partners, L.P.District Court, D. Maine · 1989
- Shultz Corp. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1989
- Finalco Equipment Investors X v. WelchDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989