Shultz Corp. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRYE, District Judge:
The matters before the court are:
1) the objections of plaintiffs, Shultz Corporation, Shultz Cattle Breeding, Inc., Shultz Cattle Company, Inc. Pitchfork Cattle Breeding Herd Limited Partnership, and Crosbell Cattle Breeding Herd Limited Partnership (the Shultz parties) to the Findings and Recommendation of the Honorable George E. Juba, United States Magistrate, dated September 26, 1989; and
2) the appeal of defendant Industrial Indemnity Co. (Industrial) from the order of Judge Juba dated September 18, 1989.
BACKGROUND
This is an action for rescission and damages…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United Steelworkers of America v. R. H. Bouligny, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chapman v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Fifty Associates, a Massachusetts Corporation v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sandhar v. CSAA General Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2020
- Young v. United Services Automobile AssociationDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021