Legal Opinion
Carlucci v. Doe
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 6, 1988No. 87-751PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
The issue in this case is whether the National Security Agency (NSA) invoked the proper statutory authority when it terminated respondent John Doe, an NSA employee. The Court of Appeals held that NSA did not — a decision with which we disagree. We first describe the statutes relevant to this case.
Section 7532 of Title 5 of the United States Code, on which the Court of Appeals relied, was passed in 1950 and reenacted and codified in 1966, as part of Chapter 75 of Title 5, the Chapter that deals with adverse actions against employees of the United States. See 5 U. S. C. §7532. The section…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Cole v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Crenshaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Milardo v. Coastal Resources Management CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
- Swan v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- John Doe v. Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Kaplan v. ConyersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Richman v. StraleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.