Legal Opinion
Richman v. Straley
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 14, 1995No. 93-4189PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
Barbara W. Richman brought an action against the United States and three federal officials, asserting that defendants’ appointment of a new standing trustee in the District of Utah and assignment of all new cases to the new trustee constituted a de facto removal of Ms. Richman as the standing trustee in violation of her right to due process under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Because we conclude that Ms. Richman did not have the requisite property interest to support a due process claim, we agree with the district court that she failed to allege a due process…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Richard A. Balser Corinne L. Balser v. Department of Justice, Office of the United States TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Miriam L. Vickers v. United States of America United States Department of Justice Immigration Andnaturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Philip R. Joelson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- AFI Holding, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.