Legal Opinion
Ormco Corp. v. Align Technology, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 23, 2009No. Case SACV 03-16 CAS (ANx)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ORMCO’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT & GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ALIGN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO NONINFRINGEMENT
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Ormco Corp. (“Ormco”) filed the instant action against defendant Align Technology, Inc. (“Align”) on January 6, 2003, alleging that Align, via its “Invisalign” process, was infringing three related Ormco patents: (1) U.S. Patent No. 5,447,-432 (“the '432 patent”); (2) U.S. Patent No. 5,683,243 (“the '243 patent”); (3) U.S. Patent No. 6,244,861…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McRo, Inc. v. Namco Bandai Games America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Westerngeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Yangaroo Inc. v. Destiny Media Technologies Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Adasa Inc. v. Avery Dennison CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- BerkeleyIEOR v. W.W. Grainger Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.