Legal Opinion
Patrick v. Moran
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 12, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.
[¶ 1] Edward Moran, Daren Hachey, and Robert Thomas Securities, Inc. (RTS) appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) denying their motion to compel arbitration. This action was brought by Richard Patrick against Moran, Hachey, and RTS for breach of fiduciary duty, interference with advantageous business relationships, and misrepresentation. The three defendants argue that an arbitration agreement exists and Patrick’s claims are arbitrable. We conclude that Moran, Hachey, and RTS failed to demonstrate that they are entitled to an order compelling…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The Prudential Insurance Co. Of America, a New Jersey Corporation v. Justine Lai Elvira ViernesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Westbrook School Committee v. Westbrook Teachers Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Saga Communications of New England, Inc. v. VoornasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Roosa v. TillotsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Nisbet v. FaunceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stenzel v. Dell, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Barrett v. McDonald Investments, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Champagne v. Victory Homes, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Barrett v. McDonald Investments, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005