Legal Opinion
Stenzel v. Dell, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 15, 2005PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
[¶ 1] Jeffrey Stenzel and Robert Gerber appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Crowley, J.) dismissing their class action complaint in favor of enforcing an arbitration clause in the standard form agreement between them and Dell. 1 Stenzel and Gerber’s first amended complaint alleged that Dell had unlawfully collected sales taxes from them on service contracts and shipping charges. On appeal, they argue that the court erred in dismissing the action because (1) they never manifested an intent to be bound by the arbitration clause; (2) the contract as a whole, and the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Barrett v. McDonald Investments, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Provencher v. Dell, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.