Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. Huddleston

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 12, 1942No. 6 Div. 898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The former appeal, reported as First National Bank of Birmingham et al. v. Huddleston, 239 Ala. 528, 195 So. 755, was from a final decree rendered on pleadings and proof, and the decree was reversed because of the absence of the Malones, held to be necessary parties, because, as stated in the opinion of the court, “They and not the bank are those on whom the burden of such a contingency would fall.” 239 Ala. 531, 195 So. 758.

The bill was filed on August 12, 1936, as a creditor’s bill to marshal the assets of an alleged insolvent corporation — Sun Creek Farms, Inc.' — under the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frahn v. Greyling Realization CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Illinois Steel Co. v. O'DonnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Olive v. TylerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
  4. Cassells Mills v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. City Bank & Trust Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. GULF DEVELOPMENT COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API