Legal Opinion
Frahn v. Greyling Realization Corporation
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 11, 1940No. 8 Div. 38PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The proceedings were initiated in the justice court under authority of General Acts 1932, Extra Session, p. 164; Code, § 8831. The constitutionality of Section two of said act is challenged as not affording due process of law.
The rules of statutory construction need not be repeated. Jefferson County v. Busby, 226 Ala. 293, 148 So. 411.
When a part of an act is challenged, the whole act relating thereto will be looked to and considered in pari materia and aid its constitutionality, if such is the effect. Mobile County et als. v. State of Alabama ex rel. Cammack, Ala.Sup., 197…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. AyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Almon v. Morgan CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Vernon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.