City Bank & Trust Co. v. Gardner
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
It is well settled by the decisions of this court, which are in accord with the weight of authority, that an oral express trust in personalty may be created; that such trust does not offend the statutes of fraud, and may be established and enforced in equity. Moore, Adm’r, v. Campbell, Ex’r, 113 Ala. 587, 21 So. 353; Id., 102 Ala. 445, 14 So. 780; Bishop’s Heirs v. Administrator & Heirs of Bishop, 13 Ala. 475; Barrell v. Hanrick, Adm’r, et al., 42 Ala. 60; Hill v. Hill et al., 216 Ala. 435, 113 So. 306; 26 R. C. L. 1194, § 30; Barnes v. Barnes, 282 Ill. 593, 118 N. E. 1004, 4 A. L. R. 4;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tapia v. DemartiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Barnes v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Moore v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- R. Bishop's Heirs v. Adm'r & Heirs of S. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gordon v. Central Park Little Boys LeagueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Tierce v. MACEDONIA UNITED METHODIST CH.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Ex parte GarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Darby v. McGregor (In Re Darby)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
- Winston v. WinstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.