McEwan v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, Justice.
[¶1] After Debora McEwan pleaded no contest to obtaining welfare benefits by misrepresentation, the district court fixed restitution at $18,733, but did not order Ms. McEwan *882to pay it. Nevertheless, the district court allowed the State to reduce $18,733 to a civil judgment, which Ms. McEwan challenges. We vacate the erroneous portions of the district court's order and remand for entry of an order conforming to statutory guidelines.
ISSUES
[¶2] 1. Did the district court erroneously allow the State to reduce $18,733 to a civil judgment?
2. Was the district court required to find that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frederick v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Sampsell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Aldridge v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Debora McEwan v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Britton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kite v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Ty Putnam v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020