Legal Opinion

McEwan v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2018No. S-17-0284PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, Justice.

[¶1] After Debora McEwan pleaded no contest to obtaining welfare benefits by misrepresentation, the district court fixed restitution at $18,733, but did not order Ms. McEwan *882to pay it. Nevertheless, the district court allowed the State to reduce $18,733 to a civil judgment, which Ms. McEwan challenges. We vacate the erroneous portions of the district court's order and remand for entry of an order conforming to statutory guidelines.

ISSUES

[¶2] 1. Did the district court erroneously allow the State to reduce $18,733 to a civil judgment?

2. Was the district court required to find that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frederick v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sampsell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Aldridge v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Debora McEwan v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Britton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kite v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Ty Putnam v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API