Legal Opinion

Aldridge v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1998No. 96-307PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

Having entered a guilty plea to burglary, John Aldridge (Aldridge) appeals from that portion of his judgment and sentence which directs payment of restitution in an amount to be later determined by his probation officer. Holding that determination of the amount of restitution is usually not subject to delay and never subject to delegation, we reverse and remand with instructions.

I. ISSUES

Aldridge articulates a single issue:

ISSUE I

Did the trial court err when it denied the appellant’s motion for a hearing on restitution?

The State of Wyoming identifies three issues:

I. Does…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Renfro v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Brezenoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Keller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hampton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Penner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Merkison v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bush v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Nixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API