Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Parker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 2014No. 918 EDA 2011PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

OLSON, J.:

Appellant, Braheim Parker, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on March 4, 2011. In this appeal, we consider whether an out-of-court question can be hearsay. We hold that an out-of-court question can be hearsay if it includes an assertion. We conclude, however, that the hearsay statement in this case was properly admitted into evidence. As we also conclude that Appellant is not entitled to relief with respect to his remaining claims of error, we affirm.

The trial court 1 accurately set forth the factual background of this case as follows:

On August 5, 2008, shortly…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MourySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Com. v. Williams, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Com. v. Lake, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Com. v. Fitzpatrick, J., IIISuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Com. v. Davis, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Com. v. Farkas, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API