Commonwealth v. Parker
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
OLSON, J.:
Appellant, Braheim Parker, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on March 4, 2011. In this appeal, we consider whether an out-of-court question can be hearsay. We hold that an out-of-court question can be hearsay if it includes an assertion. We conclude, however, that the hearsay statement in this case was properly admitted into evidence. As we also conclude that Appellant is not entitled to relief with respect to his remaining claims of error, we affirm.
The trial court 1 accurately set forth the factual background of this case as follows:
On August 5, 2008, shortly…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MourySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Com. v. Williams, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Lake, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Fitzpatrick, J., IIISuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Davis, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Farkas, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.