Legal Opinion

Reed v. Reed

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1919No. Civ. No. 2048PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order requiring defendant to pay plaintiff a certain amount monthly as alimony for her support pendente lite and another certain sum as suit money to enable her to prosecute the action.

The action was commenced by plaintiff to obtain a divorce. Her complaint, filed January 9, 1915, contained allegations showing her indigent circumstances and defendant’s possession of community property worth several thousand dollars, and prayed for alimony for her support and suit money. On March 22, 1915, defendant answered. On June 16, 1915, plaintiff served and filed a notice that,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Gay v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Mudd v. MuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Loeb v. LoebCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Chaplin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Rosenthal v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Busch v. BuschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API