Meidan, Incorporated and Technology Insurance Company v. Tina Leavell
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
BEALES, Judge.
Meidan, Incorporated and its insurer (collectively, employer) appeal the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (the commission) awarding benefits to the claimant, Tina Leavell. Employer claims that the commission erred in finding (1) that employer could have appealed the commission’s first review opinion, (2) that the commission’s findings in its first review opinion were the “law of the case,” and (3) that Leavell provided timely notice of the workplace accident that resulted in her injury. For the following reasons, we affirm the commission in this case.
I. Background
2Cases cited15 opinions
- California v. RooneySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Steinman v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
- Williams v. Gloucester Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- American Filtrona Co. v. HanfordCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- James Albert Harris, III v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
- Amparo Sanchez-Castro v. Arlington County Schools and VML Insurance ProgramsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
- City of Charlottesville v. William SclafaniCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2020
- LKQ Corporation and CCMSI v. Joseph Galarreta MoralesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023
- P.J. Potter Enterprises, Inc. v. Comfort Systems of Virginia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2025