Legal Opinion

Williams v. Gloucester Sheriff's Department

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided October 31, 2003No. Record 022213PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacy

The issue in this appeal is whether the contemporaneous objection rule prohibits a party from appealing a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission rendered on grounds neither raised nor previously addressed in the proceedings, if an objection to that decision was not made the subject of a motion for rehearing or reconsideration before the Commission.

Jeffrey L. Williams sought workers’ compensation benefits for heart disease he claimed he developed while employed by the Gloucester County Sheriff’s Department. A deputy commissioner denied his claim, and Williams sought review of this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fisher v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. Reid v. BoyleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  3. Reid v. BaumgardnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. Overhead Door Co. of Norfolk v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  5. Henrico Public Utilities v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Brittle v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  2. Hodnett v. Stanco Masonry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
  3. Brock v. Voith Siemens Hydro Power GenerationCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
  4. Lacey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. BakkeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API