Legal Opinion

Potter v. Lee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Long. J.

Plaintiffs brought assumpsit in the Wayne circuit court on the common, counts. In their bill of particulars they claimed for the price and value of 169 cheeses, weighing 7,253 pounds, at 7£ cents per pound, amounting to $543.98.

Defendant gave notice under his plea of the general issue that the plaintiffs falsely and fraudulently represented that the cheeses were good and merchantable, were not strong, and would not crumble when cut; that between 18 and 20 only were made during the month of July, 1890, and the balance were made during August of that year, and that the entire lot was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farrington v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Lee v. BangsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Rosenfield v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Talbot Paving Co. v. GormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Pratt v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Deyo v. HammondMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. James Leffel & Co. v. PiattMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API