Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that rescinded his parole release date. He contends that the Board violated applicable law by failing to hold a hearing before issuing the order. He asks us to reverse the order and to remand with specific instructions that the Board release petitioner.
We agree with petitioner that the Board violated an applicable rule by failing to hold a hearing prior to issuing its order. We decline, however, to grant petitioner the relief that he seeks. The only relief to which petitioner is entitled is a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Floyd v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- Porter v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996