Legal Opinion · Dissent

Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 2, 1996No. CA A83273Published

1DissentArmstrong, J.

The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision has petitioned for reconsideration of our previous opinion. Murphy v. Board of Parole, 140 Or App 642, 915 P2d 489 (1996) (per curiam). I concur in the majority’s decision to grant reconsideration. I dissent, however, from the majority’s conclusion that we cannot decide, on this record, whether the Board violated one of its rules by failing to hold a hearing before postponing petitioner’s parole release date.

Petitioner sought judicial review of an order of the Board that rescinded his parole release date, contending that the Board had violated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Floyd v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API