Yerian v. Brinker
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By FORNBECK, J.
Before considering this case on the merits on the original appeal we will dispose of a cross-appeal of defendant from an order of the trial judge changing the date of the judgment entry to conform tc the fact as found by the court. Without comment, we find against the claim of the defendant on his cross-appeal.
The original appeal on questions of law is directed to a judgment declaring the defendant to be the putative father of a child born to plaintiff.
The facts necessary to an understanding of the question presented are .that the plaintiff fifed her complaint against…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lynch v. RosenbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Sieg v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1923
- Donselman v. MulliganOhio Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- In Re the Marriage of SchnecklothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Maxwell v. MaxwellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Glascock v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Nelson v. NelsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.