Legal Opinion

Sieg v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1923No. 4774PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Sieg was indicted under 1308 GC. for neglect t< provide for a legitimate child. On trial Agne. Balcom, the mother of the child, was permitted, a: against objection, to testify that she was a marriei woman, and that she had not lived with or see: her husband for over four years. She testified tha Sieg had cohabited with her and was the father o the child. Her story to the affect that she had no seen her husband for a period of four years wa not corroborated by other witnesses. As the ac cused was convicted, error was prosecuted. versing the judgment of the lower court,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yerian v. BrinkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Donselman v. MulliganOhio Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API