Legal Opinion
United States v. Arthur Anagnos
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 30, 1988No. 87-1690PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
BAILEY ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendant Arthur Anagnos was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, and of conspiracy to distribute, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, but after verdict and before sentencing he jumped bail and fled the state. Ultimately apprehended, he was sentenced for the original offenses. Prior to sentenc ing he had been indicted for the bail jumping, and after the sentencing he pleaded guilty to that offense and received an on- and-after sentence. He is now serving the first, and appeals from those convictions.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ham v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. F. Thomas Little, United States of America v. Peter Chernik, United States of America v. Harold GrutchfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Julio-CardalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. MachorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Pedro R. Victoria-Peguero, United States of America v. Fernando W. Anglada AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Javier Robles-PantojaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.