Legal Opinion
Lindauer v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 20, 1970No. 70-244 CivPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Plaintiff has applied to this Court for the creation of a three judge court under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 2281 et seq. Plaintiff claims that Title 11, Oklahoma Statutes Sections 1601 to 1620 *1362inclusive, the Oklahoma Urban Development Law for cities of over 100,000 population, are unconstitutional and that their enforcement against him in taking certain properties situated in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and belonging to him denies him the equal protection of the laws in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Herbert Loyd Lindauer v. The Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority, a Public Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Lindauer v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Smiley v. State of South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1976
- Lindauer v. Oklahoma City Cuban Renewal AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970